|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Scientific Peer
Review Overview of Peer Review
Science Advisory or Review
Panels Often there is a need for advice or review throughout the development of a plan. SEI panels meet on an ongoing basis to review the technical bases of decisions. Typically panels are convened for large-scale projects and meet over a period of months or years. We have found that Science Panels are a powerful approach to controversial projects, or subjects on which there is substantial scientific disagreement. With the help of a skilled scientific mediator, open and public panel processes can lead to resolution. In-process Technical Reviews Early review may allow changes and improvements to planned actions. One or more scientists provide detailed, often on-site evaluation and advice. This can lead to substantial improvements in projects. End-process Technical Reviews Final review can determine whether a planned action has incorporated the best available science. This sort of review is particularly useful for government actions, under NEPA processes of public comment. End-process reviews often follow a strict timeframe set by statute.
Environmental decision-making is often subject to government procedures. SEI recognizes the need for reviews that are timely, accurate and coached in terms useful to decision-makers. We also recognize that reviews are usually NOT anonymous. Examples of groups served by SEI peer reviewers:
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
© 2000
Sustainable Ecosystems Institute
|
||||||||||||