Introducing PredicTER, a new tool that predicts human resource needs for environmental evidence syntheses
Search results
Sort by:
Filters:
The authors explain the thinking behind development of the ROSES reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses.
This is a qualitative systematic review of how the term "ecotechnology" is defined.
The review aims to clarify how biodiversity is affected by prescribed burning in temperate and boreal forests.
A systematic map of effects of field margins on nutrients, pollutants, socioeconomics, biodiversity, and soil retention in boreo-temperate systems.
This comment piece argues that l while literature reviews may be subject to bias if not conducted as systematic reviews.
An overview of the Environmental Evidence paper series "Stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews and maps".
ROSES is a pro forma and flow diagram designed for systematic reviews and systematic maps in the field of conservation and environmental management.
This article presents some new software developments that can facilitate evidence-based environmental management.
This article proposes three urgently needed developments in evidence synthesis to help reviewers minimize the risk of subjective bias and maximize transparency.
This article presents the findings of a systematic review showing that reduced tillage increases soil carbon storage, but only in upper soil levels.
No- and low-tillage agriculture improve soil carbon storage, but effects below the upper layer are often overestimated, according to this study.
Much is at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis.
This paper aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities and recommend approaches from stakeholder engagement research.
This paper introduces the importance of systematic review methods to fisheries and aquatic resources management.