Skip navigation
Journal article

Environmental financialization: what could go wrong?

The desire to mitigate pressure on ecosystems has led to the development of ecosystem valuation – but is it effective?

Eric Kemp-Benedict, Sivan Kartha / Published on 19 March 2019

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Kemp-Benedict, E. and Kartha, S. (2019). Environmental financialization: what could go wrong? Real-World Economics Review (87).

Valuation demonstrates how ecosystems contribute to human well-being, but has arguably also encouraged the creation of environmentally-based commodities and tradable financial assets, a process that has been called the “financialization of nature”.

The authors argue that the abstractions needed to make financial assets usable makes them unsuitable for that purpose. They identify some partial exceptions, including tradable permits to place non-specific pressure on ecosystems and socially responsible investment (SRI). However, those exceptions hold only under highly restrictive circumstances.

They further acknowledge that valuation can demonstrate the importance of ecosystems in contexts where monetary values carry substantial weight, but the streams of value are diffuse and in nearly all cases cannot be appropriated. Moreover, appropriation creates an incentive to maximize income-generating services over broader ecosystem function.

Read the paper

Open access

SEI authors

Eric Kemp-Benedict
Eric Kemp-Benedict

SEI Affiliated Researcher

SEI US

Profile picture of Sivan Kartha
Sivan Kartha

Equitable Transitions Program Director

SEI US

Read the paper
To journal Open access
Topics and subtopics
Economy : Finance / Land : Ecosystems
Related centres
SEI US

Design and development by Soapbox.