In the global climate policy debate, it is crucial to be transparent about the ethical assumptions used in climate economics models. This article focuses on Negishi weights, a common feature of integrated assessment models (IAMs) that freeze the current distribution of income between world regions.
Without this constraint, IAMs that maximize global welfare would recommend an equalization of income across regions as part of their policy advice. With Negishi weights in place, these models instead recommend a course of action that would be optimal only in a world in which global income redistribution cannot and will not take place.
This article describes the Negishi procedure and its origin in theoretical and applied welfare economics, and discusses the policy implications of its use and possible alternatives.
Download paper (pdf, 362 kb)
Design and development by Soapbox.