Skip navigation
Perspective

Accountability must be at the heart of the Paris climate pact

The first pledges for the 2015 UN climate change agreement have started to trickle in. To ensure that the agreement is effective, countries need to provide for a robust assessment and review process for contributions.

Harro van Asselt / Published on 1 April 2015
The opening plenary at the UN Climate Change Conference in Geneva, February 2015
The opening plenary at the UN Climate Change Conference in Geneva, February 2015. Photo: UNFCCC / Flickr.

Slowly but surely, the first climate pledges for the 2015 agreement – or, in UN-speak, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) – have started to trickle in.

Mexico and Norway were the latest countries to formally announce their pledges, with the United States and Russia also expected to submit their offers this week. Under the 2015 agreement, the hope is that INDCs will prove to be crucial instruments in preventing dangerous climate change. Yet a key element is still missing.

At the UN Climate Change Conference in Lima last December, countries were unable to agree on any meaningful process to review the INDCs before the Paris summit and ensure that they are sufficient to keep warming under 2C, the agreed goal.

From a practical perspective, this may make sense; after all, some INDCs are only expected later this year, leaving very limited time to assess them (notwithstanding laudable efforts by, e.g., UNEP and Climate Action Tracker). But if countries fail to provide for future assessment and review in the Paris agreement, this would significantly reduce its effectiveness.

Source: RTCC, UK

Written by

Profile picture of Harro van Asselt
Harro van Asselt

SEI Affiliated Researcher

SEI US

Topics and subtopics
Climate : Adaptation, Climate policy, Mitigation
Related centres
SEI Oxford

Design and development by Soapbox.