Skip navigation
Journal article

Institutional complexity and private authority in global climate governance: the cases of climate engineering, REDD+ and short-lived climate pollutants

This report examines how and why institutional architectures, and the roles of private institutions therein, differ across separate areas of climate governance.

Harro van Asselt / Published on 5 May 2017

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Fariborz Zelli, Ina Möller, and Harro van Asselt (2017). Institutional complexity and private authority in global climate governance: the cases of climate engineering, REDD+ and short-lived climate pollutants. Environmental Politics. 26(4). https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319020

The authors examine institutional complexity in the context of climate change. They devise a framework that explains institutional complexity in terms of the problem-structural characteristics of an issue area and the associated demand for, and supply of, private authority. They find that these characteristics can help explain the degree of centrality of intergovernmental institutions, as well as the distribution of governance functions between these and private governance institutions.

The researchers then use the framework to analyse three emerging areas of climate governance: reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) and climate engineering. They find that conflicts over means and values, as well as over relatively and absolutely assessed goods, lead to considerable variations in the emergence and roles of private institutions across the three cases.

Read the article (external link to journal – open access)

Read the paper

Open access

SEI author

Profile picture of Harro van Asselt
Harro van Asselt

SEI Affiliated Researcher

SEI US

Read the paper
10.1080/09644016.2017.1319020 Open access
Topics and subtopics
Climate : Climate policy / Governance : Public policy
Related centres
SEI Oxford