Skip navigation
Perspective

How to help climate action reach at-risk communities and lands

part of The Paris Agreement 10 years later

Start reading
Perspective

How to help climate action reach at-risk communities and lands

Research Fellow Alphayo Lutta gives the Paris Agreement a report card on its first 10 years and outlines what should be a focus to do better over the next decade. 

Alphayo Lutta / Published on 3 December 2025

Across Eastern Africa’s drylands, communities are strengthening practical governance systems that make adaptation work on the ground.

These initiatives rely on a mix of external climate finance, county co-financing, and community contributions. At the same time, their success hinges on other matters: trusted local institutions, effective governance, and the social negotiations that make resource sharing possible.

Local control is a key lever for change. In the Horn of Africa, where communities hold formal authority over grazing plans and access to strategic dry-season water points, I have seen forage regenerate, conflict decline, value chains improve, and recovery from drought accelerate far more than in neighbouring areas without such local control.

What I have witnessed happening in Africa figures into my reflections about the Paris Agreement’s record to date – and the issues that are important for its future. Here, I give the agreement a “report card”, grading how its done over the first decade, and I outline six priorities for its second decade so that it can earn higher grades.

A report card for the Paris Agreement

For its architecture of ambition: B+

     The agreement successfully created a durable system for increasing ambition over time.

For transparency and accountability: C

     Reporting systems have improved, but there are still few, meaningful consequences for non-delivery.

For adaptation and resilience: C-

     Clear implementation metrics and predictable finance to match the scale of need are lacking.

For equity and finance: C-

     While related rhetoric has increased, advances have been limited for creating consistent, adequate and accessible financial flows.

For fossil fuel supply: D

     Even though demand-side transitions have accelerated, efforts to manage the decline of fossil-fuel production remain weak and inconsistent.

Looking ahead

Here are six priorities that can strengthen the impacts of the Paris Agreement going forward:

  • Turn the Global Stocktake, which tracks progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement, into a scorecard with consequences. Keep the facilitative spirit, but introduce real incentives: access to concessional finance, favourable trade terms, and disclosure-based market benefits linked to credible implementation, not simply to pledges.
  • Set measurable outcomes for the global goal on adaptation. Adopt a concise set of globally comparable metrics – for resilient water access, climate-risk-adjusted poverty levels, heat-health protection measures, and the number of restored hectares – alongside nationally determined indicators. Pair these with country-level adaptation implementation plans and budget tagging. Use the global goal on adaptation together with the emerging Fund for responding to Loss and Damage. The two combined offer a unique chance to define what effective resilience looks like.
  • Close the fossil supply gap with orderly pathways to manage declining use. Establish national profiles for demand, supply and production sides. Align production profiles with the goal of containing global temperature rise to 1.5°C and 2°C. Create compacts to achieve a just transition and manage efforts to diversify fossil fuel-dependent economies.
  • Channel finance to the places where it can be most effective. Shift from short-term projects to ones that can last for the long haul. Devise opportunities to blend public and private finance. Put resources into county and regional climate funds. Measure progress based on executed budgets and durable governance capacity.
  • Back technologies to implement climate-resilient development pathway. Technologies are needed to scale renewables, expand storage and grid systems, improve digital monitoring of climate-related risks (such as drought and floods), and strengthen climate-smart extension services that help farmers and pastoralists use this information to adapt.
  • Put food–water–land transitions at the core of resilience building. Food systems are where climate impacts, trade disruptions and livelihoods meet. Making them resilient is foundational climate policy, not a sectoral niche.

This is perspective is part of a series by SEI researchers worldwide marking the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement by examining the lessons from its first decade and the implications for the next.