Skip navigation
Journal article

Addressing trade protectionism and climate ambition

The authors of this comment argue that applying carbon charges, not trade tariffs, would boster the Paris Agreement. They offer an outline of how border carbon adjustments (BCAs) could be used.

Harro van Asselt / Published on 16 July 2018

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Mehling, Michael, Harro van Asselt, Kasturi Das, and Susanne Droege. “Beat Protectionism and Emissions at a Stroke.” Nature 559 (2018): 321-324.

DOI

Two huge multilaterial issues – free trade and climate change – top policymakers’ agendas. The authors outline an opportunity for linking these two agendas by levying a a carbon charge on imports. They outline ways to use border carbon adjustments (BCAs) to level the emissions playing field by imposing the same economic burden on domestic and external manufacturers. BCAs would reduce producers’ incentives to manufacture goods in places with less regulation, and boost incentives for trade partners to seek low-carbon products to avoid penalties.

The authors outline how a group of like-minded countries could proceed by setting out key steps needed to balance legal durability, ease of iplementation, and environmental performance.

The authors argue that, rather than prolonging the current spiral of tariff tit-for-tat, countries should rally and turn the incipient trade war into an opportunity to ratchet up climate ambition.

Read the paper

Open access

SEI author

Profile picture of Harro van Asselt
Harro van Asselt

SEI Affiliated Researcher

SEI US

Read the paper
To journal Open access
Tags
trade
Related centres
SEI Oxford

Design and development by Soapbox.