Skip navigation
Journal article

Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish

This article presents evidence that current environmental legislation designed to protect streams and their biota in the Amazon is not fit for purpose, and needs to shift the emphasis in management to the basin scale, and include managing drainage networks and human activities within the basin.

Toby Gardner / Published on 12 November 2017

Read the paper  Closed access


Cecília G. Leal, Jos Barlow, Toby A. Gardner, Robert M. Hughes, Rafael P. Leitão, Ralph Mac Nally, Philip R. Kaufmann, Silvio F. B. Ferraz, Jansen Zuanon, Felipe R. de Paula, Joice Ferreira, James R. Thomson, Gareth D. Lennox, Eurizângela P. Dary, Cr (2017). Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish. Journal of Applied Ecology, online 12 November 2017.

Amazon stream

Amazon stream. Photo: Cecília G. Leal

Agricultural expansion and intensification are major threats to tropical biodiversity. In addition to the direct removal of native vegetation, agricultural expansion often elicits other human-induced disturbances, many of which are poorly addressed by existing environmental legislation and conservation programmes. This is particularly true for tropical freshwater systems, where there is considerable uncertainty about whether a legislative focus on protecting riparian vegetation is sufficient to conserve stream fauna.

To assess the extent to which stream fish are being effectively conserved in agricultural landscapes, the authors examined the spatial distribution of assemblages in river basins to identify the relative importance of human impacts at instream, riparian and catchment scales, in shaping observed patterns. For this they used an extensive dataset on the ecological condition of 83 low-order streams distributed in three river basins in the eastern Brazilian Amazon.

The highly heterogeneous fish faunas in small Amazonian streams underscore the vital importance of enacting measures to protect forests on private lands outside of public protected areas. Instream habitat features explained more variability in fish assemblages (15%–19%) than did riparian (2%–12%), catchment (4%–13%) or natural covariates (4%–11%).

This has policy implications. Current rates of agricultural intensification and mechanization in tropical landscapes are unprecedented, yet the existing legislative frameworks focusing on protecting riparian vegetation seem insufficient to conserve stream environments and their fish assemblages. To safeguard the species-rich freshwater biota of small Amazonian streams, conservation actions must shift towards managing whole basins and drainage networks, as well as agricultural practices in already-cleared land.

Read the paper

Closed access

SEI author

Toby Gardner
Toby Gardner

Senior Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Read the paper
10.1111/1365-2664.13028 Closed access
Topics and subtopics
Water : Water resources / Land : Land use, Forests

Design and development by Soapbox.