Skip navigation
SEI report

Considerations of Global Equity and Burden-Sharing in Community-Scale Climate Action Planning

The authors apply the Greenhouse Development Rights framework to Seattle, Wash., and find that to fulfill its global mitigation responsibilities, the city would need to go carbon “negative” before 2020 and progressively more so thereafter.

Michael Lazarus, Peter Erickson, Chelsea Chandler / Published on 30 December 2010
Citation

Erickson, P., Chandler, C., and Lazarus, M. (2010). Considerations of Global Equity and Burden-Sharing in Community-Scale Climate Action Planning. SEI-U.S. Working Paper WP-US-1008.

Cities around the world have been leaders in efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and many have adopted pledges to cut emissions by 80% from 1990 levels by 2050. However, while that goal may be considered very ambitious in terms of the required policies, technologies and actions, it may no longer represent an adequate target in terms of confronting the risks of climate change.

Furthermore, when applied at a community scale, such goals do not consider the UNFCCC principle of “common but differentiated responsibility,” which places greater burden on developed countries to finance and deliver emission reductions. In setting emissions goals, the authors suggest, communities should consider “burden-sharing” approaches that consider historic responsibility and capacity to pay. The Seattle analysis aims to demonstrate the feasibility of such approaches.

Download the paper (763kb)

SEI authors

Michael Lazarus
Michael Lazarus

Senior Scientist

SEI US

Peter Erickson

SEI Affiliated Researcher

SEI US

Related centres
SEI US

Design and development by Soapbox.