Skip navigation
Journal article

India and Africa at COP 17 – The false dichotomy of ‘survival vs. development’

Sivan Kartha / Published on 3 September 2012
Citation

Kartha, S. (2012). India and Africa at COP 17 – The false dichotomy of ‘survival vs. development’. Development Dialogue. Vol 61, September 2012. pages 118-119.

Desert

Desert

In Cancun, India was hailed for helping to bridge differences between rich and poor countries. But at COP 17, India’s stance on not agreeing to a mandate for a new legally binding treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol and the Bali Action Plan drew strong criticism, with some arguing that India’s insistence on its ‘right to development’ was a betrayal of poorer countries and even a threat to their survival.

The common wisdom is that we’ve come here to save Africa. Africa, we hear every day, is a continent populated with poor people on the front lines of climate change, where immediate adaptation is a priority and climate delay means death. India, we hear, is the grim reaper. And the purpose of COP 17 is, in large part, to compel India to step back from the brink and help save Africa. India should stop being an obstructionist and come to the rescue of Africa.

Well… some comparisons are in order.

 

Read the article on the publisher’s website (PDF)»

SEI author

Profile picture of Sivan Kartha
Sivan Kartha

Equitable Transitions Program Director

SEI US

Topics and subtopics
Climate : Adaptation, Mitigation
Tags
COP
Related centres
SEI US

Design and development by Soapbox.