This paper challenges the persistent assumption that poverty is a primary driver of biodiversity loss in conservation practice. It explores why this narrative endures despite counter-evidence and suggests that embracing a Connected Conservation approach could lead to more equitable and effective conservation outcomes.
This paper reflects on the continued persistence of the idea in conservation research and practice that poverty drives biodiversity loss (the poverty-biodiversity loss association [PBLA]). The authors draw on evidence to show how the PBLA has proven resistant to counter-evidence and is particularly visible at local-level implementation, and is often implicit in conservation strategies. They untangle three underlying reasons that help to explain why the PBLA has persisted under a verisimilitude (seeming truth) that can leave it hiding in plain sight. In doing so, the authors offer conservation science and practice the means to recognize and thereby remedy this thinking where it exists, and in so doing, advance conservation towards its aims of equitable and effective delivery. They outline how the Connected Conservation model may be better equipped to challenge the disproportionate role of wealth in biodiversity decline whilst empowering biodiversity stewards and their plural knowledge, values and governance systems.
Tool / Trase enables governments, companies and others to address the environmental impacts of supply chains.
Event on 01 July in Leeds / Join us in Leeds for a day of research and collaboration focused on the impact of indoor environments on child and adolescent health.
Event on 22 June – 26 June in Pretoria / SEI and CCAC are hosting an in-person hands-on training workshop 22–26 June in Pretoria on SEI's LEAP software for climate and clean air planning in Africa.
Feature / SEI's new Executive Director shares her thoughts as she steps into the role.
