Nature-based solutions (NbS) need to be explicitly designed to deliver measurable benefits for nature and society. The authors argue that different dimensions of scale could be better incorporated in the future design of NbS.
Efforts to scale up NbS as a strategy to help reduce risk and adapt to climate change are the subject of growing debate. Despite increasing interest in mainstreaming NbS from both public and private actors, little is known about the mechanisms and conditions for scaling up NbS in practice or how upscaling can be brought about.
The literature on NbS often alludes to the need to implement such projects with a landscape approach, but the term is ill defined. The term recently has evolved to recognize the importance of landscapes for people’s quality of life, highlighting the need to adopt a more comprehensive approach that incorporates human well-being.
This shift raises important issues for the design, monitoring and governance of NbS. Where does a landscape begin or end? What is the right scale for landscape interventions? How should one assess performance in relation to the many and sometimes contradictory goals for biodiversity, societal benefits, mitigation and adaptation today and in the future? What metrics should be measured to understand whether NbS are adequate and effective?
SEI brief / This brief introduces a four-part series on the social and economic sustainability aspects of nature-based solutions.
SEI brief / This SEI discussion brief outlines principles for designing and implementing nature-based solutions that are just and equitable.
SEI working paper / Read this new assessment on how much development finance is directed toward nature-based solutions and how effectively it is used.
Design and development by Soapbox.