Skip navigation
Journal article

The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses

This article introduces a special issue of the journal Global Environmental Politics on the expanding research agenda on institutional fragmentation.

Harro van Asselt / Published on 5 August 2013

Read the paper  Closed access

Citation

Zelli, F., and H. van Asselt (2013). The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses. Global Environmental Politics 13(3), 1-13.

The term refers to the growing diversity and challenges to coordination among private and public norms, treaties, and organizations that address a given issue area of international politics. International relations scholars increasingly address this phenomenon, framing it with alternative concepts like regime complexes or polycentricity. A considerable part of the existing debate remains focused on whether a centralized or polycentric governance architecture is preferable. Instead, as this special issue shows, domains of global environmental governance – such as climate change, biological diversity, renewable energy, and forestry – are already fragmented. It is time to address new, more pertinent questions and help advance institutionalist research on this phenomenon.

The authors introduce four major research themes for analyzing the fragmentation of different domains of global environmental governance: taking stock, causes, consequences, and responses.

Read the article (external link to journal)

Read the paper

Closed access

SEI author

Profile picture of Harro van Asselt
Harro van Asselt

SEI Affiliated Researcher

SEI US

Read the paper
10.1162/GLEP_a_00180 Closed access
Topics and subtopics
Governance : Public policy

Design and development by Soapbox.