Skip navigation
SEI report

What counts? The state of evidence of outcomes of locally led adaptation

Start reading
SEI report

What counts? The state of evidence of outcomes of locally led adaptation

This SEI report responds directly to a call from financiers for better and more nuanced evidence on the outcomes of locally led adaptation. The report 1) takes stock of the ways in which locally led adaptation initiatives have demonstrated that they can build climate resilience, 2) examines the divides that have have prevented the uptake of evidence by funders, and 3) recommends actions that can boost financial support and continue to build knowledge about what works in locally led adaptation.

Katherine Browne, Janne Parviainen, Ainka Granderson, Ameil Harikishun, Phuu Thit Kyaw, Paul Mitchell, Albert Salamanca, Vivek Venkataramani, Tiffany Chalmers, Sasha Jattansingh, Mizan Khan, David Mfitumukiza, Rose-Ann Smith, Gulru Dodkhudoeva, Praveen Rajadiston / Published on 30 September 2026

Citation

Browne, K., Parviainen, J., Granderson, A., Harikishun, A., Kyaw, P.T., Mitchell, P., Salamanca, A., Venkataramani, V., Chalmers, T., Jattansingh, S., Khan, M., Mfitumukiza, D., Smith, R., Dodkhudoeva, G., & Rajadiston, P. (2026). What counts? The state of evidence of outcomes of locally led adaptation. Stockholm Environment Institute.

Key messages:

  • Solid evidence from a wide range of geographies, sectors and approaches suggests that locally led adaptation (LLA) is a good investment, generating positive social and economic co-benefits and building communities’ capacity to adapt to climate change.
  • The evidence base has limitations and gaps. These include a focus on short-term benefits rather than long-term resilience building, limited comparative analyses, and a critical lack of recognition and documentation of Indigenous and local knowledge on LLA outcomes.
  • The report argues that the limited uptake of existing evidence by funders is largely caused by three divides: in underpinning values, ways of knowing (epistemologies), and prevailing practices in used by knowledge producers and funders.
  • The report recommends actions to help bridge divides. The recommendations build on a central tenet: Generating evidence on locally led adaptation is valuable for all, and it is essential for enabling transparency, fostering accountability, aiding learning, and strengthening sustainability of adaptation action. Key among the recommendations are:
    • Adaptation funders and host governments should recognize and use existing evidence to channel funding towards locally led adaptation by building on strengths, including Indigenous and local ways of knowing. At the same time, they should provide additional funding to produce evidence by adopting a dual-track approach that serves both their decision-making needs and those of communities.
    • Knowledge producers and other actors on the ground should continue to generate knowledge as an integral part of the adaptation mission and champion such efforts to serve aims beyond funder requirements. They should fill key knowledge gaps and synthesize evidence of LLA outcomes for uptake in national and global assessment processes, focusing particular on ethical co-production and synthesis of Indigenous and local knowledge.

This report was funded by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, through its support of the project, "Strengthening evidence on the outcomes of locally led adaptation".

SEI authors

Katherine Browne
Katherine Browne

Senior Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Janne Parviainen
Janne Parviainen

Research Fellow

SEI Oxford

Albert Salamanca
Albert Salamanca

Senior Research Fellow

SEI Asia

Topics and subtopics
Climate : Adaptation