Skip navigation
Journal article

Increasing inclusivity in biological recording in the UK: progress to date and future priorities

part of Citizen Science

Volunteer biological recording is an effective way to gather environmental data and offers benefits to participants as well as the researchers who use the information collected. However, there are demographic biases among participants which can hinder the equitable distribution of arising environmental and social benefits. In this paper, authors from eight UK organizations reflect on activities aimed at tackling these imbalances.

Rachel Pateman / Published on 15 January 2026

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Pateman, R. M., Fox, R., Dickinson, H., Haysom, K. A., Hughes, J., Kelly, L., Leech, E. I., Lowe, M., Merry, K., Murphy, R. D., Newton, N., Pocock, M. J. O., Venugopal, P., Webster, N., & Weston, S. (2025). Increasing inclusivity in biological recording in the United Kingdom: progress to date and future priorities. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.894

Close up of hands holding a mobile phone, using it to take a photograph or video of two brown and orange butterflies on a round purple flower.

Increasing inclusivity in data recording will enhance benefits for participants and organizations, enhance data for science and decision-making and lead to greater action for nature.

Photo: EyeEm Mobile GmbH / iStock / Getty Images Plus

In June 2024, representatives from eight UK organizations responsible for coordinating and supporting volunteer biological recording took part in a workshop, during which they shared insights from initiatives and actions these organizations had taken to make their volunteer recording more inclusive.

Embedding of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) at an institutional level was seen as foundational for increasing inclusivity in biological recording, as was building understanding of the diversity and experiences of their current participants.

A range of actions to increase inclusivity was described, from increasing the accessibility of webpages, introducing entry-level recording opportunities, and creating opportunities that appeal to a wide range of skills and interests. Working in depth with communities at a local level was seen as an effective way of engaging new audiences.

The workshop attendees then turned to discussing future priorities. Together, they identified that voices of currently underrepresented groups must be increased within the design, implementation and running of schemes and that investment in relationship-building through facilitator organizations will be vital for effective engagement of these groups. Crucial will be the co-creation of appealing opportunities with mutual benefits for both participants and data generation. Consideration should also be given to the opportunities for new ways of volunteering that will arise from technological advances in biological recording.

Increasing inclusivity will increase benefits for participants and organizations, enhance data for science and decision-making and lead to greater action for nature, concluded the authors.

Workshop partners

Access the paper for a full case study of each group's inclusivity work.

Funded by

Read the paper

Open access

SEI author

Rachel Pateman

SEI Affiliated Researcher

Read the paper
Citizen Science: Theory and Practice Open access
Topics and subtopics
Gender : Participation / Governance : Participation
Related centres
SEI York
Regions
United Kingdom