Editor’s choice
Editor’s choice
An assessment of bioeconomy policies in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay demonstrate neglected SDGs and identify sources such as interactions of power relations, interests and policy processes, as well as other limitations.
Although the SDGs as set out in the 2030 Agenda are in theory indivisible, research has shown that in practice their uptake and implementation is often highly uneven. Whereas the phenomenon of cherry-picking has been well documented, the authors of this paper examine the other side of the coin, i.e. the neglect of certain SDGs, using the case of bioeconomy policy in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay.
Through a combination of document analysis and a total of 50 stakeholder interviews, they assessed the degree to which the 17 SDGs are covered. Their findings demonstrate that such South American bioeconomy policies have neglected SDG 5 (Gender equality), SDG 11 (Sustainable cities and communities), SDG 14 (Life below water) and SDG 16 (Peace, justice and strong institutions). They identified different types of neglect as an outcome of the way power relations, interests and policy processes interact, notably deliberate neglect, limited imagination and a lack of coordination.
Project / This project examines how public-private sector interactions can promote democratic, just and effective climate adaptation on the ground.
Perspective / Commodities are not always the answer. Specialties suit development based on livelihood and biodiversity conservation, as well as more sustainable consumption.
Press release / Protecting and restoring forests is crucial to boosting climate-resilient agriculture, rural livelihoods and global food and water security.
