Skip navigation
Journal article

Top 20 research priorities on methods of co-production in evidence synthesis

part of Systematic evidence synthesis

Coproduction in evidence synthesis is increasingly recognized as essential for developing meaningful evidence for decision-making. This study aimed to identify and prioritize research topics through a rigorous process.

Biljana Macura / Published on 11 August 2026

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Ledinger, D., Todhunter-Brown, A., Smith, M., Griebler, U., Pollock, D., Rees, R., Tricco, A.C., Dawson, S., Macura, B., Staniszewska, S., Boddy, K., Gartlehner, G., & Nussbaumer-Streit, B. (2026). Top 20 research priorities on methods of co-production in evidence synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112286.

Key messages

  • Global effort gathered ideas for methods of co-production in evidence synthesis.

  • A total of 242 research ideas were identified, analyzed, and grouped into 31 topics.

  • In total, 58 people from 21 countries voted on these topics in a structured process.

  • Top 20 research priorities were confirmed with 98% agreement in final voting round.

Evidence synthesis is the process of bringing together information from multiple studies to provide a clearer understanding of what is known about a specific topic. Research of co-production means that research teams and people with an interest in the topic such as patients/careers/public, health-care professionals, policymakers, and many more work together to plan, conduct, and publish research that is relevant and useful. There is currently little known about how best to achieve useful and impactful coproduction for evidence synthesis.

In this study, the authors gathered ideas about possible research to improve coproduction in evidence synthesis from a range of people. They then had a series of online voting, using recognized methods to help reach agreement. They used analysis methods designed to give all groups of people an equal voice in the voting process. They gathered 242 ideas which they grouped into 31 topics. In total, 58 people from 21 countries voted on these. The process identified the shared top 20 research priorities.

Read the paper

Open access

SEI author

Biljana Macura
Biljana Macura

Senior Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Read the paper
Read the article Open access
Related centres
SEI Headquarters