This is an adapted version of an article originally published on SIANI .

Swedish International Agriculture Network Initiative (SIANI ) is a member-based network that supports the realization of the SDG2: Zero Hunger through communication, collaboration and co-creation of knowledge. SIANI is hosted by SEI.  

How did COVID-19 emerge?

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19, is most closely related to coronaviruses in bats, meaning it is a zoonosis – a disease that passes from an animal or insect to a human.

Other examples of zoonotic diseases have such now familiar and foreboding names as HIV, Zika and Ebola. But COVID-19 belongs to the same family of coronaviruses as SARS and MERS .

The outbreak of SARS in 2002 resulted in 8098 cases and 774 deaths in 26 countries. Emerging in Saudi Arabia in 2012, MERS brought about 2494 cases and 858 deaths in 27 countries. Both of them are thought to be bat viruses that got to humans through an intermediate host (civet cat and camel).

Exactly when and how the SARS-CoV-2 virus first infected humans remains to be determined. It could have come from bats to humans directly or passed through another animal. Coronaviruses are famous for their ability to exchange part of their genome, a process called recombination, something that makes them able to change hosts.

COVID-19 is believed to have originated in a wildlife market in Wuhan, China where live wild animals were sold and butchered on the spot, usually using the same slaughtering tools for different species, which creates favourable conditions for the virus to jump from animals to humans. Such markets are a perfect melting pot for new viruses to emerge and spread. However, there are reports of early cases of COVID-19 in people with no links to the market, suggesting the initial point of infection may have been in a different place.

Biodiversity, biosafety, bioinformatics: A virus risk management strategy

Prompted by the ongoing epidemic, China announced a permanent ban on wildlife trade and consumption. The global community greeted this measure as a major step, though the ban has already been criticized because it allows the trade of animals for fur, medicinal purposes and research. Additionally, China announced a similar ban in 2002 in connection to the SARS outbreak, but enforcement was relaxed after the epidemic was over and the trade rebounded.

Banning trade in wild animals is a straightforward measure to limit exposure to new pathogens. However, the wild animal trade is not the only reason behind the COVID-19 outbreak. Preventing the emergence of new zoonotic diseases requires holistic strategies that reduce risks across several dimensions and make our societies more resilient to virus outbreaks.

1. All development strategies and activities must prioritize biodiversity and find ways to create jobs, generate incomes and increase well-being, without destroying nature.

The emergence of new pathogens tends to happen in places where a dense population has been changing the landscape; agricultural expansion, deforestation, construction, mining – all contribute to the loss of natural habitat. So, the area occupied by human activity is becoming larger, while wild animals are squeezed into shrinking spaces. That is why animals that wouldn’t normally come in contact with humans do so to a greater extent, increasing the risk of exposure and spread of viruses wild animals carry and that we have not experienced before.

For instance, recent research from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) indicates that large forest fires can increase the spread of rodent-borne diseases in Sweden. However, the risks of emerging zoonotic diseases are especially high in the forested tropical regions experiencing rapid land-use change and with high wildlife biodiversity.

2. The livestock industry and farmers have to implement adequate biosafety measures.

COVID-19 sparked discussion about whether animal-based diets play a role in the emergence and spread of unknown and dangerous viruses. While there is plenty of research indicating that moderate consumption of meat has strong benefits for health and climate, to what extent livestock production represents a risk of emergence of zoonosis depends on production management factors and country context.

For instance, small-scale organic livestock farming is based on the principle that animals roam close to natural forests. This method is praised for animal well-being and lower environmental impact, but it makes contact between domestic animals and wildlife more likely. At the same time, industrial farms would usually keep animals isolated, creating conditions that prevent the spread of diseases from wild animals; however, because the animals are kept so close to each other, diseases spread fast within the herd. Furthermore, plant-based diets that utilize a lot of commodities like almonds, soya, avocados and cocoa aren’t necessarily deforestation-free.

Another key point to consider is that vegan diets may not be the best option for people in low-income countries with high malnutrition. Milk, eggs and meat are highly nutritious, so many people keep animals at home for food and for insurance in times of need . There are also traditional pastoralist communities who live in drylands. For them animal husbandry is not only a source of food security, but also the core of their culture.

For these reasons, increasing biosafety standards may offer a more appropriate way to reduce the risk of zoonotic diseases than excluding animal-based foods. Some common measures include keeping animals outside of the house, introducing designated areas for slaughtering, and ensuring these facilities and people who work there practise strict hygiene measures for all processes and equipment.

3. Funders need to ramp up investment in virology and bioinformatics , while the international community needs to improve cooperation, increase local capacities and raise awareness about these fields of knowledge.

The risk that new viruses can emerge and spread will always be there. But it is possible to minimize the losses by means of fast, accurate detection and early response. Mapping the existing viruses in all animals will help us know what is out there and start developing technologies and strategies that can help us prepare and cope with possible outbreaks, pivoting from a reactive to a proactive response. Advancing bioinformatics and virology will not only help us develop vaccines, but also to prevent pandemics through monitoring of threats while they are still evolving in animal populations.

Raising general awareness about what viruses are, how they spread and how one can protect against them is also key. Knowledge can conquer panic and prevent the creation and spread of conspiracy theories and fake news.

Go to the original article

This article was originally published by the Swedish International Agriculture Network Initiative (SIANI) . SIANI is a member-based network that supports the realization of the SDG 2: Zero Hunger through communication, collaboration and co-creation of knowledge. SIANI is hosted by SEI.