Skip navigation
Journal article

A review of how decision support tools address resource recovery in sanitation systems

About 3.6 billion people do not have access to safely managed sanitation, mostly in low- and middle-income countries. There are ongoing global efforts to increase access to sanitation, but it is also increasingly acknowledged that sanitation systems could contribute towards meeting the contemporary challenges of resource scarcity, through resource recovery from excreta, wastewater, faecal sludge and other derivatives of excreta etc.

Daniel Ddiba, Kim Andersson, Sarah Dickin / Published on 19 June 2023

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Ddiba, D., Andersson, K., Dickin, S., Ekener, E. & Finnveden, G. (2023). A review of how decision support tools address resource recovery in sanitation systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 342:118365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118365.

Biogas plant from above, Grasleben, Grasleben, Deutschland

Biogas plant from above, Grasleben, Germany. Photo: Julia Koblitz / Unsplash.

Globally, there is increasing interest in recovering resources from sanitation systems. However, the process of planning and implementing circular sanitation is complex and can necessitate software-based tools to support decision-making.

In this paper, the authors review 24 decision support software tools used for sanitation planning, to generate insights into how they address resource recovery across the sanitation chain. The findings reveal that the tools can address many planning issues around resource recovery in sanitation including analysis of material flows, integrating resource recovery technologies and products in the design of sanitation systems, and assessing the sustainability implications of resource recovery. The results and recommendations presented here can guide users in the choice of different tools depending on, for example, what kind of tool features and functions the user is interested in as well as the elements of the planning process and the sanitation service chain that are in focus.

However, some issues are not adequately covered and need improvements in the available tools including quantifying the demand for and value of resource recovery products, addressing retrofitting of existing sanitation infrastructure for resource recovery and assessing social impacts of resource recovery from a life cycle perspective. While there is scope to develop new tools or to modify existing ones to cover these gaps, communication efforts are needed to create awareness about existing tools, their functions and how they address resource recovery. It is also important to further integrate the available tools into infrastructure planning and programming processes by e.g. customizing to relevant planning regimes and procedures, to move them beyond research and pilots into practice, and hopefully contribute towards more circular sanitation systems.

Read the paper

Open access

SEI authors

Daniel Ddiba
Daniel Ddiba

Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Design and development by Soapbox.